<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1601 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462806</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. The CIT had set aside AO&#039;s assessment orders u/s 153A, directing fresh orders on disallowance u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D, claiming the original orders were erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal held that since the assessee earned no exempt income in the relevant assessment year, no disallowance u/s 14A could be made, citing PCIT vs. IL &amp;amp; FS Energy Development Company Ltd. precedent. The Tribunal concluded that AO&#039;s assessment orders were not erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interest, as twin conditions for invoking section 263 were not satisfied, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 23:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1601 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462806</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. The CIT had set aside AO&#039;s assessment orders u/s 153A, directing fresh orders on disallowance u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D, claiming the original orders were erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal held that since the assessee earned no exempt income in the relevant assessment year, no disallowance u/s 14A could be made, citing PCIT vs. IL &amp;amp; FS Energy Development Company Ltd. precedent. The Tribunal concluded that AO&#039;s assessment orders were not erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interest, as twin conditions for invoking section 263 were not satisfied, thereby allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>