<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 106 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45122</link>
    <description>The court held that the rejection of the petitioners&#039; prices by Central Excise authorities solely based on the relationship with the purchaser was unlawful. It emphasized that excise duty should be levied on a fully commercial price, regardless of relationships. The court directed authorities to assess if the petitioners&#039; prices reflect commercial prices, inclusive of costs and profits. The impugned orders were quashed, and a writ of mandamus was issued for a determination within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 106 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45122</link>
      <description>The court held that the rejection of the petitioners&#039; prices by Central Excise authorities solely based on the relationship with the purchaser was unlawful. It emphasized that excise duty should be levied on a fully commercial price, regardless of relationships. The court directed authorities to assess if the petitioners&#039; prices reflect commercial prices, inclusive of costs and profits. The impugned orders were quashed, and a writ of mandamus was issued for a determination within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>