<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 932 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774864</link>
    <description>The PMLA provides a complete statutory scheme for provisional attachment, adjudication, confirmation, appeal and further challenge, so writ interference is ordinarily inappropriate and parties must pursue the prescribed remedies before the statutory forums. A provisional attachment under Section 5 is an interim measure, and the existence of this tiered mechanism justified relegating the challengers to that process. Section 54 only empowers specified officers to assist enforcement; it does not create an independent power to impose binding bank restraints. Accordingly, any general direction freezing bank operations ceased to have effect once the provisional attachment order covered the identified properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 932 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774864</link>
      <description>The PMLA provides a complete statutory scheme for provisional attachment, adjudication, confirmation, appeal and further challenge, so writ interference is ordinarily inappropriate and parties must pursue the prescribed remedies before the statutory forums. A provisional attachment under Section 5 is an interim measure, and the existence of this tiered mechanism justified relegating the challengers to that process. Section 54 only empowers specified officers to assist enforcement; it does not create an independent power to impose binding bank restraints. Accordingly, any general direction freezing bank operations ceased to have effect once the provisional attachment order covered the identified properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>