https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774868 Bombay HC partially set aside CIC's order on RTI application seeking SEBI information about Public-Interest-Directors appointment and stock exchange inspection reports. Court upheld exemptions under Section 8(1)(e) for queries 1, 2, 6-9 involving fiduciary information and commercial confidence. However, HC remanded queries 3-5 to CPIO for fresh consideration following Section 11 third-party procedure, as information about rejected PID candidates and inspection reports constituted third-party information requiring mandatory consultation before disclosure, emphasizing privacy protection and procedural compliance. en-us Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774868 Bombay HC partially set aside CIC's order on RTI application seeking SEBI information about Public-Interest-Directors appointment and stock exchange inspection reports. Court upheld exemptions under Section 8(1)(e) for queries 1, 2, 6-9 involving fiduciary information and commercial confidence. However, HC remanded queries 3-5 to CPIO for fresh consideration following Section 11 third-party procedure, as information about rejected PID candidates and inspection reports constituted third-party information requiring mandatory consultation before disclosure, emphasizing privacy protection and procedural compliance. Case-Laws SEBI Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774868