<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 949 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774881</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against additions under section 69A read with section 115BBE for cash deposits during demonetization. The appellant provided bank statements showing withdrawals from April 1, 2016 to November 5, 2016, with a closing cash balance of 5.75 lakhs that was not questioned by the AO. The tribunal held that the appellant adequately explained the source of cash deposits, making the additions by the AO and confirmation by CIT(A) unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 949 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774881</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against additions under section 69A read with section 115BBE for cash deposits during demonetization. The appellant provided bank statements showing withdrawals from April 1, 2016 to November 5, 2016, with a closing cash balance of 5.75 lakhs that was not questioned by the AO. The tribunal held that the appellant adequately explained the source of cash deposits, making the additions by the AO and confirmation by CIT(A) unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>