<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 963 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774895</link>
    <description>Where material filed by the assessee was not effectively considered and no effective opportunity was given to substantiate the claim, the assessment and first appellate orders were set aside. The ITAT restored the matter to the first appellate authority for de novo adjudication on merits, allowing the assessee an opportunity to plead and prove the case. The dispute was not finally decided on the existing record, and the appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 963 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774895</link>
      <description>Where material filed by the assessee was not effectively considered and no effective opportunity was given to substantiate the claim, the assessment and first appellate orders were set aside. The ITAT restored the matter to the first appellate authority for de novo adjudication on merits, allowing the assessee an opportunity to plead and prove the case. The dispute was not finally decided on the existing record, and the appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>