<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 977 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774909</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC held that a notice under Section 148 for reopening assessment was barred by limitation. The court ruled that prior to amendments, such notices could only be issued within 6 years from the end of the relevant assessment year per Section 149&#039;s first proviso. The Revenue&#039;s contention that the notice was valid under Section 153 due to prior court directions was rejected, as the Revenue must take proper legal steps within the limitation period. The court emphasized that failure to follow proper procedure cannot extend statutory limitation periods. The reassessment proceedings were consequently set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 977 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774909</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC held that a notice under Section 148 for reopening assessment was barred by limitation. The court ruled that prior to amendments, such notices could only be issued within 6 years from the end of the relevant assessment year per Section 149&#039;s first proviso. The Revenue&#039;s contention that the notice was valid under Section 153 due to prior court directions was rejected, as the Revenue must take proper legal steps within the limitation period. The court emphasized that failure to follow proper procedure cannot extend statutory limitation periods. The reassessment proceedings were consequently set aside in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>