https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774912 A writ challenge to a GST demand order was declined because notice, reply and personal hearing had preceded the order, and an efficacious statutory appellate remedy remained available. Owing to the delay in approaching the Court and the availability of appeal, the HC refused writ interference and relegated the petitioner to the appellate forum. The petitioner was directed to deposit 20% of the tax confirmed in the order within the stipulated time, and the appellate authority was instructed to decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. en-us Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774912 A writ challenge to a GST demand order was declined because notice, reply and personal hearing had preceded the order, and an efficacious statutory appellate remedy remained available. Owing to the delay in approaching the Court and the availability of appeal, the HC refused writ interference and relegated the petitioner to the appellate forum. The petitioner was directed to deposit 20% of the tax confirmed in the order within the stipulated time, and the appellate authority was instructed to decide the appeal on merits without reference to limitation. Case-Laws GST Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774912