<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 983 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774915</link>
    <description>Bail was granted in a prosecution under the Rajasthan GST Act, 2017 because the offences carried a maximum punishment of five years, investigation had been completed, and the charge-sheet had been filed. The Court noted the absence of similar criminal antecedents and that the trial was likely to take considerable time, making continued custody unnecessary. The decision was made without commenting on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 983 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774915</link>
      <description>Bail was granted in a prosecution under the Rajasthan GST Act, 2017 because the offences carried a maximum punishment of five years, investigation had been completed, and the charge-sheet had been filed. The Court noted the absence of similar criminal antecedents and that the trial was likely to take considerable time, making continued custody unnecessary. The decision was made without commenting on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>