https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774917 An interest demand for the July 2017 to March 2018 period was challenged on the ground that other notices and consequential orders for the same tax period had already been issued under the Delhi GST and Central GST regimes, creating an apparent overlap. The Court noted that appeals had already been filed against the other orders and treated the duplication as relevant to interim protection. Coercive recovery under the impugned order was restrained pending further proceedings, while the remaining proceedings were permitted to continue and pleadings were directed to be completed. en-us Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774917 An interest demand for the July 2017 to March 2018 period was challenged on the ground that other notices and consequential orders for the same tax period had already been issued under the Delhi GST and Central GST regimes, creating an apparent overlap. The Court noted that appeals had already been filed against the other orders and treated the duplication as relevant to interim protection. Coercive recovery under the impugned order was restrained pending further proceedings, while the remaining proceedings were permitted to continue and pleadings were directed to be completed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774917