https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45107 The writ petition was held not maintainable because the petitioner had efficacious statutory remedies available, namely before the Tribunal under Section 35C(2) and by way of reference under Section 35G. The grievance that the plea on extended limitation and penalty calculation had not been considered did not justify interference under Article 226, so the petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:27:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45107 The writ petition was held not maintainable because the petitioner had efficacious statutory remedies available, namely before the Tribunal under Section 35C(2) and by way of reference under Section 35G. The grievance that the plea on extended limitation and penalty calculation had not been considered did not justify interference under Article 226, so the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45107