<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1509 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462781</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition under &quot;House Property&quot; for annual letting value. The property remained vacant throughout the assessment year despite being rented in previous years, with no rent received. ITAT held that Section 23(1)(c) applied to vacant properties, not Section 23(1)(a) as applied by AO and confirmed by CIT(A). The tribunal set aside the impugned order, treated rental value as NIL, and deleted the addition made by authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1509 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462781</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition under &quot;House Property&quot; for annual letting value. The property remained vacant throughout the assessment year despite being rented in previous years, with no rent received. ITAT held that Section 23(1)(c) applied to vacant properties, not Section 23(1)(a) as applied by AO and confirmed by CIT(A). The tribunal set aside the impugned order, treated rental value as NIL, and deleted the addition made by authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>