<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1600 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462784</link>
    <description>ITAT held for the assessee that donations made to specified private foundations as part of CSR obligations qualified for deduction under section 80G, because a payment lacking material return is a donation and the statutory CSR mandate does not bar 80G claims absent an explicit legislative restriction. The tribunal found s.37&#039;s CSR disallowance does not preclude independent 80G relief. The tribunal also deleted an s.14A disallowance (Amendment held prospective), concluding both issues in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1600 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462784</link>
      <description>ITAT held for the assessee that donations made to specified private foundations as part of CSR obligations qualified for deduction under section 80G, because a payment lacking material return is a donation and the statutory CSR mandate does not bar 80G claims absent an explicit legislative restriction. The tribunal found s.37&#039;s CSR disallowance does not preclude independent 80G relief. The tribunal also deleted an s.14A disallowance (Amendment held prospective), concluding both issues in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>