<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1506 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462786</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed a petition challenging a final order under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that since the petitioner had a statutory alternative remedy of filing an appeal against the order, there was no justification to invoke extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition was found to be not maintainable due to the availability of the statutory appellate remedy, and was accordingly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 19:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1506 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462786</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed a petition challenging a final order under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that since the petitioner had a statutory alternative remedy of filing an appeal against the order, there was no justification to invoke extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition was found to be not maintainable due to the availability of the statutory appellate remedy, and was accordingly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>