<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Orders invalidated due to missing signatures on DRC-07, mandatory under statutory execution rules</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90507</link>
    <description>The HC held that the impugned orders were vitiated due to the absence of signatures on the DRC-07 document, which is a statutory requirement. The court emphasized that when a statute prescribes a specific mode of execution, compliance with that mode is mandatory, and any deviation renders the act invalid. The lack of signatures on DRC-01 and DRC-07 could not be overridden by explanations in the counter affidavit or notes. Consequently, the petition challenging the orders was disposed of in favor of the petitioner, affirming that non-compliance with statutory formalities invalidates the impugned orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:39:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Orders invalidated due to missing signatures on DRC-07, mandatory under statutory execution rules</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90507</link>
      <description>The HC held that the impugned orders were vitiated due to the absence of signatures on the DRC-07 document, which is a statutory requirement. The court emphasized that when a statute prescribes a specific mode of execution, compliance with that mode is mandatory, and any deviation renders the act invalid. The lack of signatures on DRC-01 and DRC-07 could not be overridden by explanations in the counter affidavit or notes. Consequently, the petition challenging the orders was disposed of in favor of the petitioner, affirming that non-compliance with statutory formalities invalidates the impugned orders.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:39:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>