<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 839 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774771</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad dismissed the appeal regarding interest calculation on refund claims. The tribunal held that when statute prescribes interest rates, courts must follow statutory provisions rather than exercising discretionary powers. The appellant was entitled to interest on refunded amounts after dispute resolution, but interest under Section 11BB should be calculated from three months after refund application receipt, not from deposit date. The tribunal distinguished Supreme Court precedent in Dr. Poornima Advani case, noting it applied where no statutory provision existed for interest payment, unlike the present case where Sections 35FF and 11BB specifically governed interest calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 839 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774771</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad dismissed the appeal regarding interest calculation on refund claims. The tribunal held that when statute prescribes interest rates, courts must follow statutory provisions rather than exercising discretionary powers. The appellant was entitled to interest on refunded amounts after dispute resolution, but interest under Section 11BB should be calculated from three months after refund application receipt, not from deposit date. The tribunal distinguished Supreme Court precedent in Dr. Poornima Advani case, noting it applied where no statutory provision existed for interest payment, unlike the present case where Sections 35FF and 11BB specifically governed interest calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>