<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 859 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774791</link>
    <description>Gross misdeclaration of goods was found, and the Custom House Agent was held responsible for that misdeclaration. The High Court found no substantial question of law arising in second appeal and, given the nature of the misdeclaration, declined to interfere. The appeal was therefore not entertained and was dismissed, leaving the Tribunal&#039;s order undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 859 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774791</link>
      <description>Gross misdeclaration of goods was found, and the Custom House Agent was held responsible for that misdeclaration. The High Court found no substantial question of law arising in second appeal and, given the nature of the misdeclaration, declined to interfere. The appeal was therefore not entertained and was dismissed, leaving the Tribunal&#039;s order undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>