<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 861 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774793</link>
    <description>A delay of 2523 days in filing an appeal was not condoned because the explanation that the matter had earlier been filed in the Madras High Court without jurisdiction was found insufficient. The Court noted that, even after the High Court&#039;s decision on 21 November 2024, there was still a further delay of about six months in approaching the Supreme Court. On that basis, no sufficient cause was shown for the inordinate delay, and the condonation application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 861 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774793</link>
      <description>A delay of 2523 days in filing an appeal was not condoned because the explanation that the matter had earlier been filed in the Madras High Court without jurisdiction was found insufficient. The Court noted that, even after the High Court&#039;s decision on 21 November 2024, there was still a further delay of about six months in approaching the Supreme Court. On that basis, no sufficient cause was shown for the inordinate delay, and the condonation application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>