<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 866 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774798</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune condoned a 198-day delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) in a case involving unexplained money under section 69A. The tribunal held that non-representation by tax consultant should not be fatal to the assessee, depriving them of a hearing on merits. The matter was restored to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to provide updated contact details to the department and remain vigilant regarding proceedings without seeking unnecessary adjournments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 866 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774798</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune condoned a 198-day delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) in a case involving unexplained money under section 69A. The tribunal held that non-representation by tax consultant should not be fatal to the assessee, depriving them of a hearing on merits. The matter was restored to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to provide updated contact details to the department and remain vigilant regarding proceedings without seeking unnecessary adjournments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>