<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45078</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the duty increase notification, emphasizing that publication in the Official Gazette rendered it enforceable. The sudden duty hike was deemed not to violate fundamental rights, and the vessel&#039;s entry inwards date was crucial for duty calculation. The petition was dismissed, with the Court highlighting the importance of gazette publication for notification enforcement and the significance of the vessel&#039;s entry date for duty determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:01:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45078</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the duty increase notification, emphasizing that publication in the Official Gazette rendered it enforceable. The sudden duty hike was deemed not to violate fundamental rights, and the vessel&#039;s entry inwards date was crucial for duty calculation. The petition was dismissed, with the Court highlighting the importance of gazette publication for notification enforcement and the significance of the vessel&#039;s entry date for duty determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>