<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 912 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774844</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a GST demand under section 73 was held unsustainable where the taxpayer had admitted the liability and deposited the tax amount. The court also declined writ interference on interest and penalty because those grievances could be pursued under the statutory appellate remedy under section 107. In the absence of any reason to bypass that remedy, the petition was not entertained and the petitioner was left at liberty to proceed in appeal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:39:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 912 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774844</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a GST demand under section 73 was held unsustainable where the taxpayer had admitted the liability and deposited the tax amount. The court also declined writ interference on interest and penalty because those grievances could be pursued under the statutory appellate remedy under section 107. In the absence of any reason to bypass that remedy, the petition was not entertained and the petitioner was left at liberty to proceed in appeal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>