https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45074 The Designated Authority under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was confined to determining the amount payable and had no jurisdiction to examine the merits of a pending excise appeal or fix liability on that basis. The merits of the disputed excise demand were treated as matters for the appellate tribunal, not for the scheme authority. On that footing, the writ petition was found to have prima facie substance, rule was issued, and conditional interim relief was granted directing acceptance of the declared amount pending further orders. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:54:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45074 The Designated Authority under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was confined to determining the amount payable and had no jurisdiction to examine the merits of a pending excise appeal or fix liability on that basis. The merits of the disputed excise demand were treated as matters for the appellate tribunal, not for the scheme authority. On that footing, the writ petition was found to have prima facie substance, rule was issued, and conditional interim relief was granted directing acceptance of the declared amount pending further orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45074