<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1698 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462757</link>
    <description>The NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an application seeking recall of order under Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016. The Tribunal held that the applicant was attempting to re-argue the matter under the guise of recall application, which is impermissible. The NCLAT clarified that it does not possess review powers as such authority is not provided under the Code, resulting in dismissal of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 20:15:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1698 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462757</link>
      <description>The NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an application seeking recall of order under Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016. The Tribunal held that the applicant was attempting to re-argue the matter under the guise of recall application, which is impermissible. The NCLAT clarified that it does not possess review powers as such authority is not provided under the Code, resulting in dismissal of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>