https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45069 Use of a tea estate name on cleared tea may raise a legal question on whether it constitutes a brand name under the tariff entry, so the dispute was not treated as one to be left entirely to departmental adjudication before judicial scrutiny. A writ challenge to the show cause notices on that basis was not regarded as an abuse of process, because the controversy went to the foundation of the notices and justified intervention at that stage. The petition was permitted to proceed, rule was issued, and limited interim protection was granted pending determination of the substantive issue. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:42:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45069 Use of a tea estate name on cleared tea may raise a legal question on whether it constitutes a brand name under the tariff entry, so the dispute was not treated as one to be left entirely to departmental adjudication before judicial scrutiny. A writ challenge to the show cause notices on that basis was not regarded as an abuse of process, because the controversy went to the foundation of the notices and justified intervention at that stage. The petition was permitted to proceed, rule was issued, and limited interim protection was granted pending determination of the substantive issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45069