https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462752 Once the underlying probate appeal and connected applications were finally disposed of, the property ceased to remain in custodia legis and the court could not continue to exercise jurisdiction over it through a later application. The dismissal of special leave petitions did not amount to affirmation of the earlier reasoning or create merger for that purpose. On the lease dispute, the court treated the 5 May 1986 order as permission to the joint receivers to enter into a lease on stated terms, not as a completed grant of lease in the abstract. Equity supported enforcement of the agreed lease terms only for the premises already delivered and occupied, with arrears and dues payable, while relief for the other premises and damages was not sustained. en-us Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:21:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462752 Once the underlying probate appeal and connected applications were finally disposed of, the property ceased to remain in custodia legis and the court could not continue to exercise jurisdiction over it through a later application. The dismissal of special leave petitions did not amount to affirmation of the earlier reasoning or create merger for that purpose. On the lease dispute, the court treated the 5 May 1986 order as permission to the joint receivers to enter into a lease on stated terms, not as a completed grant of lease in the abstract. Equity supported enforcement of the agreed lease terms only for the premises already delivered and occupied, with arrears and dues payable, while relief for the other premises and damages was not sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462752