https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45067 A writ petition filed before adjudication of show cause notices was not entertained because the petitioner had an adequate statutory remedy under the excise law and should first submit a reply to the notices. The Court directed the petitioner to file the reply, required the authority to pass a speaking order on that reply, and kept recovery in abeyance until such order is made. The matter was thus left to the statutory process rather than being examined on the merits at the notice stage. en-us Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:37:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45067 A writ petition filed before adjudication of show cause notices was not entertained because the petitioner had an adequate statutory remedy under the excise law and should first submit a reply to the notices. The Court directed the petitioner to file the reply, required the authority to pass a speaking order on that reply, and kept recovery in abeyance until such order is made. The matter was thus left to the statutory process rather than being examined on the merits at the notice stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45067