https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45059 A writ challenge to a Tribunal's order directing partial pre-deposit under the proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was rejected because undue hardship was not shown. The Court held that a prima facie case, even a strong one, does not by itself satisfy the undue hardship requirement for interference under Article 226. On the material before it, compliance with the reduced pre-deposit amount was not shown to cause hardship warranting writ relief, so the challenge to the pre-deposit direction failed. en-us Tue, 26 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:14:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45059 A writ challenge to a Tribunal's order directing partial pre-deposit under the proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was rejected because undue hardship was not shown. The Court held that a prima facie case, even a strong one, does not by itself satisfy the undue hardship requirement for interference under Article 226. On the material before it, compliance with the reduced pre-deposit amount was not shown to cause hardship warranting writ relief, so the challenge to the pre-deposit direction failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45059