https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90465 The SC dismissed the appeal challenging the exclusion of commercial spaces from the Corporate Debtor's assets and the approval of the Resolution Plan under the IBC. The Court found no sufficient grounds to interfere with the Adjudicating Authority's order despite dissenting Financial Creditors' claims under Section 30(2)(b). The NCLAT's observation allowing the appellant to file a separate application for rent claims arising post-CIRP commencement, potentially recoverable as CIRP costs, was noted but did not affect the final decision. Consequently, the impugned judgment approving the Resolution Plan was upheld in its entirety. en-us Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:31 +0530 Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90465 The SC dismissed the appeal challenging the exclusion of commercial spaces from the Corporate Debtor's assets and the approval of the Resolution Plan under the IBC. The Court found no sufficient grounds to interfere with the Adjudicating Authority's order despite dissenting Financial Creditors' claims under Section 30(2)(b). The NCLAT's observation allowing the appellant to file a separate application for rent claims arising post-CIRP commencement, potentially recoverable as CIRP costs, was noted but did not affect the final decision. Consequently, the impugned judgment approving the Resolution Plan was upheld in its entirety. Highlights IBC Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:31 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90465