<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Order under Section 147 and 144B invalid for denying proper time to submit evidence, violating natural justice principles</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90457</link>
    <description>The HC held that the order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the I.T. Act was invalid due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. The NFAC granted the petitioner only four days to upload voluminous evidence, contrary to the seven-day period mandated by the Standard Operating Procedure under Section 144B(6)(xi). This insufficient time frame deprived the petitioner of a reasonable opportunity to respond. Consequently, the Court found a manifest violation of procedural fairness and set aside the assessment order. The petitioner&#039;s appeal was allowed, emphasizing adherence to prescribed timelines to uphold natural justice in faceless assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Order under Section 147 and 144B invalid for denying proper time to submit evidence, violating natural justice principles</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90457</link>
      <description>The HC held that the order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the I.T. Act was invalid due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. The NFAC granted the petitioner only four days to upload voluminous evidence, contrary to the seven-day period mandated by the Standard Operating Procedure under Section 144B(6)(xi). This insufficient time frame deprived the petitioner of a reasonable opportunity to respond. Consequently, the Court found a manifest violation of procedural fairness and set aside the assessment order. The petitioner&#039;s appeal was allowed, emphasizing adherence to prescribed timelines to uphold natural justice in faceless assessments.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>