<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal Upholds Resolution Plan Approval, Rejects Late Tax Claims Under Section 30(2) of IBC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90445</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the approval of the resolution plan under Section 30(2) of the IBC, rejecting the appellant&#039;s attempt to recall the order based on belated statutory tax claims. The appellant failed to exercise due diligence in filing claims within the prescribed timeframe, and allowing such late claims would undermine the insolvency resolution process, prejudice other creditors, and jeopardize the plan&#039;s viability. The tribunal emphasized that finality in the resolution process is paramount, and reopening claims post-approval violates the statutory framework and established Supreme Court precedents prohibiting belated claims. The resolution plan, approved by the CoC with requisite majority, complied with Sections 30(2) and 53 .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal Upholds Resolution Plan Approval, Rejects Late Tax Claims Under Section 30(2) of IBC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90445</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the approval of the resolution plan under Section 30(2) of the IBC, rejecting the appellant&#039;s attempt to recall the order based on belated statutory tax claims. The appellant failed to exercise due diligence in filing claims within the prescribed timeframe, and allowing such late claims would undermine the insolvency resolution process, prejudice other creditors, and jeopardize the plan&#039;s viability. The tribunal emphasized that finality in the resolution process is paramount, and reopening claims post-approval violates the statutory framework and established Supreme Court precedents prohibiting belated claims. The resolution plan, approved by the CoC with requisite majority, complied with Sections 30(2) and 53 .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>