https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774732 A person lacking subsisting, recorded or otherwise legally enforceable cultivation rights cannot maintain a challenge to attachment orders where the claimed tenancy interest has already been transferred through sub-lessees. The Tribunal also treated disputes over cultivation rights as falling within the exclusive province of the revenue authorities under the governing tenancy statutes, which define cultivating tenant status and reserve tenancy-title questions for that forum. On that basis, the appellants were held to have no locus standi, and the attachment-related orders were left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774732 A person lacking subsisting, recorded or otherwise legally enforceable cultivation rights cannot maintain a challenge to attachment orders where the claimed tenancy interest has already been transferred through sub-lessees. The Tribunal also treated disputes over cultivation rights as falling within the exclusive province of the revenue authorities under the governing tenancy statutes, which define cultivating tenant status and reserve tenancy-title questions for that forum. On that basis, the appellants were held to have no locus standi, and the attachment-related orders were left undisturbed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774732