<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 806 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774738</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging NCLT&#039;s withdrawal of earlier directions for conducting a secretarial audit. The tribunal held that the impugned order was merely a continuation of previous directions and not a review/recall under Section 420(2) of Companies Act 2013. The NCLAT found the withdrawal justified as the Practicing Company Secretary&#039;s report confirmed no financial statements were filed with ROC during 2015-2023, indicating the company was non-operational. Without basic compliance parameters being met, conducting a secretarial audit would serve no purpose. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 806 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774738</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging NCLT&#039;s withdrawal of earlier directions for conducting a secretarial audit. The tribunal held that the impugned order was merely a continuation of previous directions and not a review/recall under Section 420(2) of Companies Act 2013. The NCLAT found the withdrawal justified as the Practicing Company Secretary&#039;s report confirmed no financial statements were filed with ROC during 2015-2023, indicating the company was non-operational. Without basic compliance parameters being met, conducting a secretarial audit would serve no purpose. The appeal was dismissed as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>