<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 807 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774739</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC modified a Single Judge&#039;s order directing release of imported areca nuts consignment. The court held that under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, provisional release requires both proper bond and security, which the Single Judge failed to mandate. While petitioners were entitled to provisional release during pending adjudication proceedings, the court modified the interim order to require additional security of bank guarantee or equivalent worth 25% of the consignment&#039;s value. The classification dispute under Chapter-VIII or Chapter-XX remained undecided. Appeal was disposed of with modified conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 807 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774739</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC modified a Single Judge&#039;s order directing release of imported areca nuts consignment. The court held that under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, provisional release requires both proper bond and security, which the Single Judge failed to mandate. While petitioners were entitled to provisional release during pending adjudication proceedings, the court modified the interim order to require additional security of bank guarantee or equivalent worth 25% of the consignment&#039;s value. The classification dispute under Chapter-VIII or Chapter-XX remained undecided. Appeal was disposed of with modified conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>