<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 815 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774747</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that intimation order u/s 143(1) dated 30.03.2019 was invalid as it was passed without providing mandatory 30-day response period to assessee. The order was issued on 30.03.2019 while assessee&#039;s response time expired on 22.04.2019. ITAT found the screenshot showing assessee&#039;s response on 23.03.2019 was incorrect, noting same-day issue and response dates were unlikely. The intimation order was declared bad in law, disallowance made thereunder was deleted, and assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 815 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774747</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that intimation order u/s 143(1) dated 30.03.2019 was invalid as it was passed without providing mandatory 30-day response period to assessee. The order was issued on 30.03.2019 while assessee&#039;s response time expired on 22.04.2019. ITAT found the screenshot showing assessee&#039;s response on 23.03.2019 was incorrect, noting same-day issue and response dates were unlikely. The intimation order was declared bad in law, disallowance made thereunder was deleted, and assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>