<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 837 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774769</link>
    <description>MP HC held that denial of cross-examination opportunity regarding witnesses whose statements were relied upon in CGST proceedings violated principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that cross-examination rights under Evidence Act are fundamental to natural justice, citing SC precedent. The matter was remanded to the authority to proceed from the cross-examination stage. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for proper adherence to natural justice principles in tax and penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 837 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774769</link>
      <description>MP HC held that denial of cross-examination opportunity regarding witnesses whose statements were relied upon in CGST proceedings violated principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that cross-examination rights under Evidence Act are fundamental to natural justice, citing SC precedent. The matter was remanded to the authority to proceed from the cross-examination stage. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for proper adherence to natural justice principles in tax and penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>