<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45049</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request for a Writ of Mandamus as the respondents assured compliance with the circular instructions dated 11-6-1990 regarding the search and seizure of silver bullions. The court found that the respondents were following the Ministry&#039;s instructions to prevent undue harassment to law-abiding individuals possessing small quantities of silver bullions, justifying their actions under the Customs Act, 1962. Consequently, the court concluded that issuing the Writ of Mandamus was unnecessary and disposed of the petition based on the respondents&#039; statement of adherence to the circular instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:53:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45049</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request for a Writ of Mandamus as the respondents assured compliance with the circular instructions dated 11-6-1990 regarding the search and seizure of silver bullions. The court found that the respondents were following the Ministry&#039;s instructions to prevent undue harassment to law-abiding individuals possessing small quantities of silver bullions, justifying their actions under the Customs Act, 1962. Consequently, the court concluded that issuing the Writ of Mandamus was unnecessary and disposed of the petition based on the respondents&#039; statement of adherence to the circular instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>