<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1289 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462751</link>
    <description>An order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be sustained where the assessee was denied an opportunity of hearing. On the admitted procedural lapse, the consequential notice issued under Section 148 also fell with the order. The HC quashed both the order and the notice and remitted the matter to the authority for fresh consideration after granting the petitioner a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 23:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1289 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462751</link>
      <description>An order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be sustained where the assessee was denied an opportunity of hearing. On the admitted procedural lapse, the consequential notice issued under Section 148 also fell with the order. The HC quashed both the order and the notice and remitted the matter to the authority for fresh consideration after granting the petitioner a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>