<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 94 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45044</link>
    <description>Commodity classification under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act turns on common parlance identity. Pan parag or pan masala without tobacco may fall within scented arecanut as an arecanut-based preparation, but tobacco-based pan parag is treated as a different commodity because consumers of tobacco products form a distinct class and it is not ordinarily regarded as scented arecanut. On that basis, tobacco-based pan parag, if proved to be the assessee&#039;s product, would be taxable as an unclassified item. The existing record did not contain a clear finding that the turnover consisted entirely of tobacco-based pan parag, so a final classification could not be made without that factual determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 94 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45044</link>
      <description>Commodity classification under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act turns on common parlance identity. Pan parag or pan masala without tobacco may fall within scented arecanut as an arecanut-based preparation, but tobacco-based pan parag is treated as a different commodity because consumers of tobacco products form a distinct class and it is not ordinarily regarded as scented arecanut. On that basis, tobacco-based pan parag, if proved to be the assessee&#039;s product, would be taxable as an unclassified item. The existing record did not contain a clear finding that the turnover consisted entirely of tobacco-based pan parag, so a final classification could not be made without that factual determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>