<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 36 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45041</link>
    <description>Municipal octroi valuation under Clause 2(7)(a) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation (Levy of Octroi) Rules, 1965 could not include notional customs duty or additional/countervailing duty that was not actually payable at the time of import under advance licences. A duty exemption under the Duty Exemption Scheme did not create a present liability capable of being added to the assessable value merely because a contingent liability might arise on breach of licence conditions. The earlier Division Bench view was applied: the Corporation had no authority to recover excess octroi by loading notional customs duty, and the possibility of later refund did not validate the inclusion. The petitioners therefore succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 36 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45041</link>
      <description>Municipal octroi valuation under Clause 2(7)(a) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation (Levy of Octroi) Rules, 1965 could not include notional customs duty or additional/countervailing duty that was not actually payable at the time of import under advance licences. A duty exemption under the Duty Exemption Scheme did not create a present liability capable of being added to the assessable value merely because a contingent liability might arise on breach of licence conditions. The earlier Division Bench view was applied: the Corporation had no authority to recover excess octroi by loading notional customs duty, and the possibility of later refund did not validate the inclusion. The petitioners therefore succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>