<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45036</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellants were entitled to a refund of sales tax collected from them. The Court held that the appellants did not pass on the tax burden to consumers and should be refunded for the period starting three years before the writ petition was filed. The judgment underscored the need to assess individual circumstances when determining eligibility for tax refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45036</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellants were entitled to a refund of sales tax collected from them. The Court held that the appellants did not pass on the tax burden to consumers and should be refunded for the period starting three years before the writ petition was filed. The judgment underscored the need to assess individual circumstances when determining eligibility for tax refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>