<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petition challenging Duty Drawback Scheme, DEEC, and EPCG dismissed; government safeguards upheld under relevant customs rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90416</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition challenging the implementation of the Duty Drawback Scheme, DEEC, and EPCG, finding that the petitioner&#039;s claim to informer status was denied and that relevant information originated from a foreign consulate. The affidavit filed by the Ministry of Revenue detailed actions taken against the implicated firms and measures adopted by Customs to prevent future fraud. The court held that the government&#039;s safeguards adequately address the petitioner&#039;s concerns. No further relief was granted, and the petition was disposed of with the directive that any ongoing investigations related to the matter be concluded expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:40:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:41:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petition challenging Duty Drawback Scheme, DEEC, and EPCG dismissed; government safeguards upheld under relevant customs rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90416</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition challenging the implementation of the Duty Drawback Scheme, DEEC, and EPCG, finding that the petitioner&#039;s claim to informer status was denied and that relevant information originated from a foreign consulate. The affidavit filed by the Ministry of Revenue detailed actions taken against the implicated firms and measures adopted by Customs to prevent future fraud. The court held that the government&#039;s safeguards adequately address the petitioner&#039;s concerns. No further relief was granted, and the petition was disposed of with the directive that any ongoing investigations related to the matter be concluded expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:40:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>