<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 713 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774645</link>
    <description>Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allows an appeal within the prescribed period and permits condonation only up to the further period expressly provided by the statute. The Appellate Tribunal has no jurisdiction to extend time beyond that outer limit. Because the delay in filing the appeal exceeded the statutory ceiling, condonation could not be granted. The refusal to condone delay was therefore upheld and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 713 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774645</link>
      <description>Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allows an appeal within the prescribed period and permits condonation only up to the further period expressly provided by the statute. The Appellate Tribunal has no jurisdiction to extend time beyond that outer limit. Because the delay in filing the appeal exceeded the statutory ceiling, condonation could not be granted. The refusal to condone delay was therefore upheld and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>