<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 714 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774646</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed an appeal challenging an NCLAT order under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016. The appellant contested the petition&#039;s admissibility on grounds of limitation, threshold support requirements, and alleged fraudulent claims with material suppression. The NCLAT had ruled that objections regarding allottees&#039; eligibility were without merit as respondents satisfied Section 7(1) threshold requirements. The SC found no good reason to interfere with the NCLAT&#039;s decision dated 23.04.2025 and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 714 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774646</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed an appeal challenging an NCLAT order under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016. The appellant contested the petition&#039;s admissibility on grounds of limitation, threshold support requirements, and alleged fraudulent claims with material suppression. The NCLAT had ruled that objections regarding allottees&#039; eligibility were without merit as respondents satisfied Section 7(1) threshold requirements. The SC found no good reason to interfere with the NCLAT&#039;s decision dated 23.04.2025 and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>