<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 151 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45023</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Customs Tribunal&#039;s judgment, affirming that drill rods/pipes and drill bits are not considered essential parts of a drilling rig for excise duty purposes and should be assessed separately. This decision aligns with a previous ruling by the Supreme Court on the same matter. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 151 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45023</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Customs Tribunal&#039;s judgment, affirming that drill rods/pipes and drill bits are not considered essential parts of a drilling rig for excise duty purposes and should be assessed separately. This decision aligns with a previous ruling by the Supreme Court on the same matter. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>