<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1439 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462738</link>
    <description>At the quashing stage under Section 482 CrPC, the court must confine itself to whether the record discloses a prima facie case or strong suspicion, not assess evidence reliability or the likelihood of conviction. Where the investigation record included the complainant&#039;s statement, the accused&#039;s alleged role in introducing the principal offender, inducement for procuring employment, recovery of money at the accused&#039;s instance, and call detail evidence, the High Court should not have treated the matter as a premature trial on merits. The quashing order was therefore set aside and the criminal proceedings were directed to continue for trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 20:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1439 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462738</link>
      <description>At the quashing stage under Section 482 CrPC, the court must confine itself to whether the record discloses a prima facie case or strong suspicion, not assess evidence reliability or the likelihood of conviction. Where the investigation record included the complainant&#039;s statement, the accused&#039;s alleged role in introducing the principal offender, inducement for procuring employment, recovery of money at the accused&#039;s instance, and call detail evidence, the High Court should not have treated the matter as a premature trial on merits. The quashing order was therefore set aside and the criminal proceedings were directed to continue for trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>