<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1558 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462727</link>
    <description>Delhi HC declined to allow immediate re-export of goods (ammonia sulphate, poppy seeds, areca nuts) that were erroneously shipped to India without bill of entry being filed. While acknowledging goods hadn&#039;t crossed import barrier and some were perishable, court noted ongoing investigations by authorities. HC directed respondents to complete investigation within two months considering petitioner&#039;s explanation that goods were mistakenly shipped and recall was sought while goods were on high seas. Court refused to waive demurrage/ground rent charges despite petitioner&#039;s request, noting warehouse permission was already granted but not utilized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 20:19:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1558 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462727</link>
      <description>Delhi HC declined to allow immediate re-export of goods (ammonia sulphate, poppy seeds, areca nuts) that were erroneously shipped to India without bill of entry being filed. While acknowledging goods hadn&#039;t crossed import barrier and some were perishable, court noted ongoing investigations by authorities. HC directed respondents to complete investigation within two months considering petitioner&#039;s explanation that goods were mistakenly shipped and recall was sought while goods were on high seas. Court refused to waive demurrage/ground rent charges despite petitioner&#039;s request, noting warehouse permission was already granted but not utilized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>