<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45016</link>
    <description>The DEPB verification process was constrained by the departmental circulars, which treated the declared FOB or present market value as accepted if no show-cause notice was issued within 30 days of export. Once the exporter produced shipping bills, bank certificates and related records evidencing export, realisation and licence issuance, Customs could not rely on an open-ended power to reopen the declared value or keep the licences under further enquiry. The circulars were binding on field officers, so the deeming acceptance of value had to be given effect. The practical result was that the DEPB licences were required to be verified and the credit made available without further delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 102 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45016</link>
      <description>The DEPB verification process was constrained by the departmental circulars, which treated the declared FOB or present market value as accepted if no show-cause notice was issued within 30 days of export. Once the exporter produced shipping bills, bank certificates and related records evidencing export, realisation and licence issuance, Customs could not rely on an open-ended power to reopen the declared value or keep the licences under further enquiry. The circulars were binding on field officers, so the deeming acceptance of value had to be given effect. The practical result was that the DEPB licences were required to be verified and the credit made available without further delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>