<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45010</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanded the case for reconsideration. The Court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s strong prima facie case for exemption based on historical approvals and highlighted undue hardship due to financial strain. The Tribunal was directed to reassess the application under Section 35F, considering relevant factors and ensuring the protection of Revenue&#039;s interest. The case was deemed a question of law, allowing resolution without affidavits, with the respondents&#039; failure to file an affidavit-in-opposition considered as non-admission of allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:55:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45010</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanded the case for reconsideration. The Court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s strong prima facie case for exemption based on historical approvals and highlighted undue hardship due to financial strain. The Tribunal was directed to reassess the application under Section 35F, considering relevant factors and ensuring the protection of Revenue&#039;s interest. The case was deemed a question of law, allowing resolution without affidavits, with the respondents&#039; failure to file an affidavit-in-opposition considered as non-admission of allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>