<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45007</link>
    <description>The SC held that sales of charge chrome to a foreign buyer were sales in the course of export and therefore exempt from sales tax. The decisive factor was that the later charge chrome contracts themselves specified quantity, price, foreign destination, shipment terms, inspection at the port of discharge, and transfer of title only after receipt of proceeds. By contrast, the earlier off-take arrangement was only an agreement to sell, not the operative sale contract. Because the export was immediately occasioned by the sale contract itself, and not by any independent intermediary resale, the impugned assessment orders could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45007</link>
      <description>The SC held that sales of charge chrome to a foreign buyer were sales in the course of export and therefore exempt from sales tax. The decisive factor was that the later charge chrome contracts themselves specified quantity, price, foreign destination, shipment terms, inspection at the port of discharge, and transfer of title only after receipt of proceeds. By contrast, the earlier off-take arrangement was only an agreement to sell, not the operative sale contract. Because the export was immediately occasioned by the sale contract itself, and not by any independent intermediary resale, the impugned assessment orders could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>