<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 688 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774620</link>
    <description>Dispute concerned short payment of liability as ascertained by the officer and whether an adequate hearing had been given. The court noted that the petitioners&#039; challenge to re-fixation of the classification of services raised a question of fact requiring examination of documents, and that an alternative remedy was available to pursue their grievance. The petition was accordingly disposed of with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 08:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 688 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774620</link>
      <description>Dispute concerned short payment of liability as ascertained by the officer and whether an adequate hearing had been given. The court noted that the petitioners&#039; challenge to re-fixation of the classification of services raised a question of fact requiring examination of documents, and that an alternative remedy was available to pursue their grievance. The petition was accordingly disposed of with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>